When you use your real transmitter and fly real RC models do you use game controller or aviation terminology. I can tell from many of the posts in the forums (and even KE, RF and HH staff) that the many posters have no other experience than games and RF. Unless you want to learn all about the PC game world, and specifically Microsoft, any editing is impossible.

Not is RF -which inconsistently uses THEIR channels ( and who knows what that means in RF ) mixed in with all the crazy game controller terminology.

So it should be simple to go to the aircraft edit menu and set these up in the software radio using standard flight surface terminology like Aileron, Elevator, Rudder. that you fly the real transmitter and planes with. The plane you want to fly doesn't have the same expo, rates, etc. And Phoenix is much more malleable with understandable setups and editors to make it work like a real pilot expects. If the toy game controller terminology is so great why isn't it used on RC transmitters and receivers and all RC and real aircraft? The physics in Phoenix is much more like actual full scale that I have flown and RC models that I fly now. And flying models since FF and CL in the 1950 and never saw it there until I got RF. and I never once saw the PC game controller terminology in all those years. I come from the world of real flying starting with flying off carriers in Viet-Nam and then over 4 decades as an aviation systems/avionics engineer. I suppose if I flew helis with a few of your specific FBLs I would have spent the inordinate amount of time to learn all this crazy AXES, ROTATIONS, etc. Unless you are from the PC kids gaming world and understand the arcane terminology there are stumbling blocks at every stage. Click to expand.The setup process in RF makes it unusable without a ridiculous amount of relearning and work.

Phoenix rc vs realflight 7